This weekend, I started listening to the audiobook of Oliver Sacks' Musicophilia
The Columbia University professor is probably  the country’s best known neurologist. He has the ability to make the complexities of neurological disorders  understandable to laymen while portraying the afflictions of his  patients in a compelling and compassionate way. 
When the book was first published, writer Scott Horton of HARPER'S Magazine put 6 questions to Dr. Sacks  about his remarkable study of music and the human brain.  
Here's one of the exchanges:
4.  You suggest that we favor language as our primary  medium for the communication of ideas, but your book develops the case  for music as another important vehicle.  Doesn’t this suggest that music  and language have the potential to reinforce and support one another as  media of communication?
There is a great deal of debate about the relationship  between music and language, and speculation about which capacity evolved  first.  It has often been suggested that music emerged as a by-product  of linguistic capacities. But musical rhythm, with its regular pulse, is  very unlike the irregular stressed syllables of speech. We will  probably never know the answer here, but whether parts of the brain  evolved specifically to process music, or music happened to make use of  neural pathways that arose for other reasons, it is clear that music has  been central to the human enterprise for 40,000 years or more. Bone  flutes, some of which date back even further than this, have been found  at Neanderthal campsites. Sharing music is one of the most powerful ways  humans bond together, and this has obvious survival value. We still use  music in this way, to come together in singing religious songs, holiday  music, national anthems, protest songs, even “Happy Birthday.” If we  had a time machine, it would be fascinating to learn how early music and  speech came together in the form of song. Steven Mithen, in The Singing Neanderthals,  proposes that speech and music developed simultaneously, as a sort of  song-speech, which later separated into spoken language and music.
Read the full interview at harpers.org 

 
 
 
2 comments:
Did you know that the songs that you listened to when you were 14 years old have the most profound influence on you? Found that out a couple of days ago. What were you listening to at age 14?
You will love this list of Top 100 songs of 1973. (Tony Orlando rocks!)
http://www.bobborst.com/popculture/top-100-songs-of-the-year/?year=1973
Post a Comment